Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blue Spike, LLC v. Audible Magic Corporation, No. 6:15-cv-00584 (E.D. Tex. June 24, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00584, Dkt. No. 1834
Decided
June 24, 2015
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER (Previously filed in 6:12cv499)
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Audible Magic’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 1698), Blue Spike’s response (Dkt. No. 1753), and Audible Magic’s reply (Dkt. No. 1774). Also before the Court are the parties’ Local Patent Rule (“P.R.”) 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No. 1674) and P.R. 4-5(d) Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. No. 1789). A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d , 517 U.S.