Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Tinnus Enterprises, LLC et al v. Telebrands Corporation et al, No. 6:15-cv-00551 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00551, Dkt. No. 181
Decided
April 28, 2016
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 9,051,066 (“the ’066 Patent”). Plaintiffs Tinnus Enterprises, LLC, and ZURU Ltd. (“Plantiffs”) allege that Defendants Telebrands Corp. and Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (“Defendants”) infringe certain claims of the ’066 Patent . Plaintiffs filed an opening claim construction brief (Doc. No. 162), to which Defendants filed a responsive brief (Doc. No. 1 72), to which Plaintiffs f iled a reply (Doc. No. 1 75).