Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Flexuspine, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00201 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 5, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00201, Dkt. No. 191
Decided
August 5, 2016
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER re 163 Claim Construction Brief filed by Flexuspine, Inc., 151 Claim Construction Brief filed by Flexuspine, Inc., 153 Claim Construction Brief filed by Globus Medical, Inc
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On April 8 , 2016 , the Court issued an order construing the disputed claim terms of United States Patent Numbers 7,204,853 (“the ’853 Patent”), 7,316,714 (“the ’714 patent”), 7,909,869 (“the ’869 Patent”), 8,123,810 (“the ’810 Patent”), and 8,647,386 (“the ’386 Patent”) asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Flexuspine, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant Globus Medical, Inc. (“Defendant”).