Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Marketing Systems, LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00134 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2016)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00134, Dkt. No. 131
Decided
May 3, 2016
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court ADOPTS the constructions set forth in this Order. Defendants' Motion to Strike the Untimely Expert Declaration of Dr. Andrew Cromarty 94 is GRANTED
Length
45 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms of United States Patent Numbers 8,219,445 (“the ’445 Patent”), 8,370,199 (“the ’199 patent”), and 8,538,805 (“the ’805 Patent”) asserted in th ese consolidated actions by Plaintiff Advanced Marketing Systems , LLC (“AMS”) against Defendant s CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Walgreen Co. (collectively, “Defendants”).1 On February 25, 2016, the parties presented oral argument on the terms at a Markman hearing. The Court ADOPTS the constructions set forth below.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case