Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Safenet, Inc. v. Uniloc USA Inc. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00097 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2015)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00097, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
October 5, 2015
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court sets a summary judgment hearing on the issues of marking and release in the 6:15cv97 case for 1-21-2016. The Court sets a consolidated Claim Construction hearing for the 6:13cv906 and 6:15cv97 cases f…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In a scheduling conference held on July 8, 2015, for the SafeNet, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. action (“the - 97 case”), the Court asked the parties to submit proposals regarding case management and scheduling in the above-captioned cases. On July 15, 2015, Uniloc USA, Inc. (“Uniloc USA”) and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (“Uniloc Luxembourg”) (collectively “Uniloc”) and SafeNet, Inc. (“SafeNet”) (and the SafeNet-Indemnified Defendants) submitted scheduling proposals as ordered (Doc. Nos. 53 & 54).