Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00043 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:15-cv-00043, Dkt. No. 37
Decided
September 21, 2015
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 25 Motion to Transfer Venue
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC’s (“AT&T”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) (Doc. No. 25 ) (“Motion ”). Plaintiff Adaptix, Inc. (“Adaptix”) filed a response (Doc. No. 28) (“Response”) to which AT&T replied (Doc. No. 31 ) (“Reply”) and Adaptix filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 33 ) (“Sur -Reply”). After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES AT&T’s Motion to Transfer Venue. BACKGROUND On January 13, 2015 , Adaptix filed the instant action against AT&T, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.