Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00982 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2016)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00982, Dkt. No. 206
Decided
May 13, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, AND ORDER DENYING 147 Claim Construction Brief, filed by Sprint Solutions, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., Boost Mobile, LLC, Kyocera Communications, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) In…
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in Uni ted States Patent Nos. 8,385,966 (“the ’966 Patent”), 8,848,556 (“the ’556 Patent”), and 8,868,060 (“the ’060 Patent”), asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Doc. No. 147). On December 17, 2015, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms and on the Motion for Summary Judgment at a Markman hearing.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error