Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00759 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 29, 2016)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00759, Dkt. No. 206
Decided
March 29, 2016
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court hereby ADOPTS the above claim constructions for the patents-in-suit. For ease of reference, the Courts claim interpretations are set forth in a table in Appendix A
Length
39 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,218,923 (“the ’8923 Patent”), 8,055,820 (“the ’820 Patent”), 8,645,786 (“the ’786 Patent”), and 8,254,872 (“the ʼ872 patent”), asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. The parties ’ claim construction briefing also addresses Defendants’ indefiniteness arguments. On January 12, 2016, the parties presented oral arguments on the dispute d claim terms and on the indefiniteness arguments at a Markman hearing.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error