Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. The City of Fort Worth, Texas, No. 6:14-cv-00725 (E.D. Tex. June 8, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00725, Dkt. No. 119
Decided
June 8, 2016
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER re 112 Claim Construction Chart or Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement filed by e-WATCH CORPORATION
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,323,980 (“the ’980 Patent”). Plaintiff 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC alleges that Defendant e- Watch Corporation infringes the ’980 Patent. Plaintiff filed an opening claim construction brief (Doc. No. 95), to which Defendant file d a Response (Doc. No. 101), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 107). The parties additionally submitted a Joint Claim Construction Chart pursuant to P.R. 4 -5(d). Doc. No. 112. On May 12 , 2016, the Court held a claim construction hearing.