Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TracBeam, L.L.C. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00678 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00678, Dkt. No. 256
Decided
July 14, 2016
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 7,298,327 (“the ’ 327 Patent”); 7,525,484 (“the ’4 84 Patent”); 7,764,231 (“the ’231 Patent”); and 8,032,153 (“the ’153 Patent) asserted by Plaintiff TracBeam L.L.C. (“TracBeam”) against Defendants T -Mobile US, Inc. and T -Mobile USA, Inc. (“T -Mobile”) and Apple, Inc. (“Apple”). On December 18, 2015 , the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. Apple has since settled and many of the disputes are now moot .