Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. E-MDs, Inc., No. 6:14-cv-00625 (E.D. Tex. May 31, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00625, Dkt. No. 495
Decided
May 31, 2016
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 5,682,526 (“the ’526 Patent”) and 5,715,451 (“the ’451 Patent”) asserted by Plaintiff s Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. (collectively “Uniloc”). On February 10, 2016, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated below, the court ADOPTS the following constructions.