Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

UltimatePointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:14-cv-00562 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00562, Dkt. No. 350
Decided
December 3, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants' 288 Motion to Strike P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions. UltimatePointer SHALL amend its infringement contentions by 12-13-2013. The Court also GRANTS IN PART Nintendo's 289 …
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff UltimatePointer, LLC’s (“UltimatePointer”) P.R. 3 -1 Infringement Contentions (Docket No. 288) and Defendants Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America Inc.’s (collectively, “Nintendo”) Motion to Compel a Complete Response to Individual Interrogatory No. 1 (Docket No. 289). The Court heard arguments regarding these motions on November 14, 2013. Based on the parties’ briefings and arguments, the Court GR ANTS IN PART Defendants’ Motion to Strike P.R.