Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Google LLC et al, No. 6:14-cv-00435 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2015)

Granted in Part
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00435, Dkt. No. 179
Decided
May 29, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ORDER STAYING CASE in reference to Dkt. Nos. 164 and 167
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) the Motion To Stay Litigation Pending Covered Business Method Review filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (Apple) (Dkt. No. 546 in 6:13- CV-447, hereinafter Apple Mot ion) and; (2) the Renewed Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Covered Business Method Review filed by HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC ’s (collectively, Samsung)1 (Dkt. No. 495 in 6:13-CV-448, hereinafter Samsung Motion).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error