Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Landmark Technology, LLC v. Union Pacific Corp., No. 6:14-cv-00026 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2014)

Granted in Part
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:14-cv-00026, Dkt. No. 36
Decided
July 3, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 35 Joint MOTION to Construe More Than 10 Terms filed by Landmark Technology, LLC, Union Pacific Corp. Additionally, the court STAYS the 6:14cv26 action as an exercise of its discretion and in…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants The ADT Corporation, The Jones Group Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation and Hugo Boss USA, Inc. ’s (collectively, “ ADT Defendants”) renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings Until the USPTO has Completed Its CBMR Proceedings ( Case No. 6:13cv758-JDL, Doc. No. 74) (“ADT Motion”). The matter is fully briefed. Case No. 6:13cv758-JDL, Doc. Nos. 76, 80 and 84. Defendant Tempur Sealy International, Inc., f/k/a Tempur-Pedic International Inc (“Tempur Sealy”) filed a Notice of Joinder with ADT’s Motion (Case No. 6:13cv413-JDL, Doc. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error