Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 6:13-cv-00883 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2015)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00883, Dkt. No. 95
Decided
January 8, 2015
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 8,115,012 (“the ‘012 Patent”). Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and Chrimar Holding Company LLC allege that Defendants1 infringe the ‘012 Patent. Plaintiff s 1Defendants i nclude Alcatel -Lucent USA, Inc., Alcatel -Lucent Holdings, Inc., AMX LLC, Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Defendants Aastra Technologies, Ltd., Aastra USA Inc, and Grandstream Networks, Inc. have since settled. Ch rimar Systems, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error