Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Blue Spike, LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 6:13-cv-00679 (E.D. Tex. May 16, 2016)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00679, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
May 16, 2016
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 5,745,569 (“the ’569 Patent”) asserted by Plaintiff Blue Spike, LLC (“Blue Spike”). On February 11, 2016, the parties presented oral arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated below, the court ADOPTS the following constructions. BACKGROUND The ’569 Patent relates to technology for the protection of computer code copyrights by including “digital watermarks” in the code. ’569 Patent Abstract.