Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cellular Communications Equipment LLC v. HTC Corporation et al, No. 6:13-cv-00507 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2015)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00507, Dkt. No. 363
Decided
March 9, 2015
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the claim constructions as set forth in this Order. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness 287 is DENIED
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,819,923 (“the ’ 9923 Patent”), 6,810,019 (“the ’ 019 Patent”), 7,941,174 (“the ’ 174 Patent”), 8,055,820 (“the ’820 Patent”), and 7,218,923 (“the ’8923 Patent”), asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Cellular Communications Equipment LLC. Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 287).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case