Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00441 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2014)

Granted in Part
Indefiniteness Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00441, Dkt. No. 102
Decided
November 20, 2014
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 85 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based on Indefiniteness Under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) are GRANTED as to claim 8 of the 748 patent and …
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following: 2 (1) Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA Inc., Cricket Communications, Inc. d/b/a Cricket Wireless, T-Mobile USA, Inc., MetroPCS Communications, Inc., and MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.’s Objections to September 19, 2014 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed in 6:13c v438, -439, -440, and - 441 (Dkt. Nos. 110, 105, 112, 93); (2) Defendants ZTE (USA) Inc., Boost Mobile LLC, T -Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., and U.S.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error