Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Landmark Technology, LLC v. Tempur-Pedic International, Inc., No. 6:13-cv-00413 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00413, Dkt. No. 47
Decided
July 3, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
STAYS the 6:13cv413 action
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants The ADT Corporation, The Jones Group Inc., Briggs & Stratton Corporation and Hugo Boss USA, Inc. ’s (collectively, “ ADT Defendants”) renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings Until the USPTO has Completed Its CBMR Proceedings ( Case No. 6:13cv758-JDL, Doc. No. 74) (“ADT Motion”). The matter is fully briefed. Case No. 6:13cv758-JDL, Doc. Nos. 76, 80 and 84. Defendant Tempur Sealy International, Inc., f/k/a Tempur-Pedic International Inc (“Tempur Sealy”) filed a Notice of Joinder with ADT’s Motion (Case No. 6:13cv413-JDL, Doc. No.