Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

VirnetX Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 6:13-cv-00351 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00351, Dkt. No. 142
Decided
December 17, 2014
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this order
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No s. 6,502,135 (“the ‟135 Patent”), 7,188,180 (“the ‟180 Patent”), 7,418,504 (“the ‟ 504 Patent”), 7,490,151 (“the ‟151 Patent”), 7,921,211 (“the ‟ 211 Patent”), and 7,987,274 (“the ‟ 274 Patent”) (collectively, “the patents -in-suit”). On September 4, 2014, the parties presented arguments on the disputed claim terms at a Markman hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs VirnetX Inc. and Leidos, Inc.