Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., No. 6:13-cv-00256 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00256, Dkt. No. 577
Decided
November 17, 2014
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 5,490,216 (“the ‟216 Patent”). In lieu of holding a Markman hearing on claim construction issues in this case, the parties stipulated to rely on claim construction briefing and proceedings in an earlier case, styled Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of Am. et al., No. 6:10-cv-373 (“Uniloc I”). Docket No. 72. The Court granted the parties‟ stipulation on July 17, 2014 and incorporated the Uniloc I claim construction filings into the record . Docket No. 73.