Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LifeScreen Sciences LLC v. Cordis Corporation, No. 6:13-cv-00091 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2014)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00091, Dkt. No. 72
Decided
August 12, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construc tion Opinion construes terms in claims 1 and 28 of United States Patent No. 5,709,704 (the “‘704 Patent”) and claims 19 and 36 of United States Patent No. 6,214,025 (the “‘025 Patent”) . Plaintiff LifeScreen Sciences LLC (“LifeScreen”) alleges Defendant Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) infringes the ‘704 and ‘025 Patents (collectively, the “Patents-In-Suit”). BACKGROUND LifeScreen filed an Opening Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 63 ). Cordis filed a Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Doc. No. 67).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error