Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. et al v. Corel Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00968 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 15, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 7,024,696 (the ’696 Patent). On September 18, 2014, the parties presented arguments on the disputed claim terms at the Markman hearing. The Court resolves the claim te rm disputes as stated and for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND On December 21, 2012, Plaintiffs Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. and Uniloc USA, I nc. (collectively “Uniloc”) filed the lead action captioned above and its action (6:12- cv-972) against PerkinElmer, Inc.