Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC v. Pepsi-Cola Company et al, No. 6:12-cv-00956 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2015)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Objections and Appeal of Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 36, filed September 23, 2015.) The Magistrate Judge’s Report recommended that Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss Based on Lack of Jurisdiction be denied. (Dkt. No. 26.) Af ter reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss Based on Lack of Jurisdiction (Dkt. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error