Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00855, Dkt. No. 553
Decided
January 12, 2018
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION detailing the reasons for denying Apple Inc.'s Motion to Stay 518
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VIRNETX INC. and LEIDOS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:12-CV-00855-RWS MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a Motion to Stay (Docket No. 518) on February 28, 2017. On September 29, 2017, the Court denied the motion with memorandum order to follow and ordered Plaintiff VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) and Apple to meet and confer on a trial date for this case. Docket No.