Invensys Systems, Inc. v. Emerson Electric Co. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00799 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,124,646 (“the ’646 Patent”); 7,136,761 (“the ’761 Patent”); 6,311,136 (“the ’136 Patent”); 7,505,854 (“the ’854 Patent”); 6,754,594 (“the ’594 Patent”); 7,571,062 (“the ’062 Patent”); and 8,000,906 (“the ’906 Patent”) (collectively, “the Invensys Patents”) , asser ted in this suit by Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”) . Also before the Court is Micro Motion’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 144).