Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd; et al, No. 6:12-cv-00421 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2012)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00421, Dkt. No. 1
Decided
June 28, 2012
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
l Action 6:09cv203) (mll, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Fractus S.A.'s request for an Ongoing Royalty is SEVERED from Civil action 6:09cv203 into a seperate action
Length
85 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the parties’ post-tria l motions. Having considered the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court: DENIES Samsung’s Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law that : (1) Samsung Does Not Infringe Any Claim of the Patents-in- Suit; (2) the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in -Suit are Invalid; (3) Samsung is Not A Willful Infringer; and (4) the Damages Award wa s Improper (Docket No.