Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00123 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00123, Dkt. No. 116
Decided
February 26, 2014
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re Claim Construction
Length
112 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 112), Defendants’ response (Dkt. No. 118), Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 128), and Defendants’ sur-reply (Dkt. No. 129). Also before the Court are the parties’ Local Patent Rule (“P.R.”) 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No. 100) and P.R. 4-5(d) Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. No. 133, Ex. A). A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff’d, 517 U.S.