Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership et al, No. 6:12-cv-00121 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2013)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00121, Dkt. No. 51
Decided
March 28, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER GRANTING 35 MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) filed by HTC America, Inc., Cellco Partnership
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to transfer venue 1 (Doc. No. 35). Having fully considered the parties’ arguments, the undisputed facts, and the appli cable law, the Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS this action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. I. BACKGROUND This litigation involves alleged patent infringement of two re lated patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,947,748 (the ’748 patent) and 7,454,212 (the ’212 patent).