E.D. Tex.

MacroSolve, Inc. v. Geico Insurance Agency, Inc. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00074 (E.D. Tex. July 23, 2013)

Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.: No. 6:12-cv-00074, Dkt. No. 68
Decided: July 23, 2013
Judge: John D. Love, M.J.
Document: Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry: ve on 7/23/2013. (gsg)MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER DENYING 54 Opposed MOTION For Leave to Supplement Their Invalidity Contentions filed by Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Insurance Agency, Inc
Length: 10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motions for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (No. 6:11-cv-287, Doc. No. 396); (No. 6:12-cv-74, Doc. No. 54) (collectively “MOTION”).1 The matter has been fully briefed (No. 6:11-cv-287, Doc. Nos. 399, 401, & 405) ; (No. 6:12-cv-74, Doc. Nos. 56, 58, & 60). Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, the Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND On January 30, 2012, MacroSolve, Inc. (“MacroSolve” or “Plaintiff”) brought suit against Newegg for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816 (“the ‘816 patent”). (No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error