Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Adaptix, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc. et al, No. 6:12-cv-00017 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00017, Dkt. No. 180
Decided
March 12, 2014
Judge
Caroline Craven, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER regarding claim terms
Length
34 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 168), Defendants’ Response (Dkt. No. 170), and Plaintiff’s Reply (Dkt. No. 175).1 Also before the Court are the parties’ Local Patent Rule (“P.R.”) 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No. 121) and the parties’ P.R. 4-5(d) Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. No. 177). 1 This briefing supersedes prior briefing filed by the parties. See Dkt. Nos. 135, 149 & 153. 2 A claim construction hearing, in accordance with Markman v.