Cell and Network Selection LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00706 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant s’1 Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) (Doc. No. 43) (“MTN.”). Plaintiff Cell and Network Selection, LLC (“CNS”) filed a response (Doc. No. 45) (“RESPONSE”) to which Defendants replied (Doc. No. 55) (“REPLY”) and CNS filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 56) (“SUR-REPLY”). After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue. BACKGROUND On December 29 , 2011, CNS filed the instant action against Defendants, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No.