Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Roy-G-Biv Corporation v. ABB, Ltd. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00622 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00622, Dkt. No. 196
Decided
July 25, 2013
Judge
Zack Hawthorn, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the terms of the patents in suit
Length
64 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

These cases are assigned for trial to the Honorable Leonard Davis, United States Chief District Judge, and are referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for claim construction purposes, including Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness . (Doc. No. 158.) On June 19, 2013, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,513,058; 6,516,236; 6,941,543; and 8,073,557, and to hear argument on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. See (Transcript, Doc. No.