Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

UltimatePointer, LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., et al, No. 6:11-cv-00571 (E.D. Tex. May 28, 2013)

Granted in Part
Claim Construction Summary Judgment Indefiniteness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00571, Dkt. No. 202
Decided
May 28, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing United States Patent No. 7,746,321 and United States Patent No. 8,049,729. For ease of reference, the Court's claim interpretations are set forth in a table as Appendix A. This Order is also granting …
Length
40 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Opinion construes United States Patent No. 7,746,321 (“‘321 Patent”) and United States Patent No. 8,049,729 (“‘729 Patent”). Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Case No. 6:11cv496, Dkt. No. 243). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion. BACKGROUND UltimatePointer asserts both method and systems claims from the ‘321 and ‘729 patents.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error