Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. OEA International, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00532 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00532, Dkt. No. 34
Decided
September 20, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong GRANTING 21 Motion to Sever and Motion to Transfer Case to the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is defendant Lonestar Inventions LP’s (“Lonestar”) Motion to Sever and to Transfer (ECF No. 21). The matter has been fully briefed (ECF Nos. 21, 25, 27). Having considered the parties’ arguments, the Court GRANTS defendant Lonestar ’s motion to sever and to transfer. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING LONESTAR’S MOTION TO SEVER AND TO TRANSFER I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE A. The Lonestar v. Sony Proceeding (E.D.