Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ICH Intellectual Capital Holdings, Inc. v. Badger Meter, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00468 (E.D. Tex. July 2, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00468, Dkt. No. 182
Decided
July 2, 2013
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed terms of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,315,257 and 7,248,181
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms of U.S. Patent No s. 7,315,257 (“the „ 257 p atent”) and 7,248,181 (“the „181 patent”) (collectively the “patents -in- suit”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff ICH Intellectual Capital Holdings, Inc. (“ICH”) allege s Defendants1 infringe several claims of the patents -in-suit. The parties have presented extensive claim construction briefing. (Doc. Nos. 159, 164, 169, 172).