Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stragent, LLC et al v. Intel Corporation, No. 6:11-cv-00421 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00421, Dkt. No. 122
Decided
August 8, 2013
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this Order
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,848,072 (“the ‘072 patent”); 7,028,244 (“the ‘244 patent”); and 7,320,102 (“the ‘102 patent”). Plaintiffs Stragent, LLC and TA G Foundation (“collectively, Strage nt”) allege Defendant Intel Corporation (“Intel”) infringes the patents-in-s uit. The parties have presented their claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 79, 82 & 88) . On March 7, 2013, the Court held a claim construction hearing.