Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Advanced Display Technologies of Texas, LLC v. Dell, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00391 (E.D. Tex. July 12, 2012)

Granted in Part
Claim Construction Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00391, Dkt. No. 201
Decided
July 12, 2012
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this order. Defts' Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 1 of US Patent No 6,261,664 is Invalid 165 is GRANTED
Length
30 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,739,931 (“the ‘931 patent) and 6,261,664 (“the ‘664 patent”) (together, the “Patents-in-Suit”). The Court also GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Su mmary Judgment that Clai m 1 of U.S. Patent No. 6,261,664 is Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 2 (Doc. No. 165, “SJ MTN”). 2 BACKGROUND Advanced Display Technologies of Texa s, LLC (“ADT”) asserts the ‘931 and ‘664 patents against a number of defendants across two cas es.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error