Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00390 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00390, Dkt. No. 235
Decided
April 11, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness 205 is DENIED
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,882,771 (“the ‘ 771 Patent”), 7,116,862 (“the ‘862 Patent”), 7,339,714 (“the ‘714 Patent”), 6,856,459 (“the ‘459 Patent”), and 6,940,647 (“the ‘ 647 Patent”). Additionally, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 205) is DENIED.