Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MacroSolve, Inc. v. Antenna Software, Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00287 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00287, Dkt. No. 493
Decided
January 21, 2014
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions as set forth in this Order
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,822,816 (“the „816 Patent”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff MacroSolve, Inc. alleges that Defendants Newegg Inc. and GEICO Insurance Agency, Inc. et al, (collectively “GEICO”) infringe the „816 patent. The „816 Patent discloses a “System and Method for Data Management.” The prior art involved gathering data away from a computer, traditionally on paper forms, and then later entering it into a computer.