Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Stragent, LLC et al v. BMW North America LLC et al, No. 6:11-cv-00278 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2013)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00278, Dkt. No. 389
Decided
July 3, 2013
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER construing the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,953,599
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 7,953,599 (“the ‘599 patent”). Plai ntiffs Stragent LLC and TAG Foundation (collectively “Stragent”) allege that Defendants 1 infringe the ‘599 patent. Th e parties have presented their claim construction positions (Doc. Nos. 346, 352, 355 & 359).2 On February 28, 2013, the Court held a claim construction hearing. For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below.