Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Azure Networks LLC et al v. CSR plc et al, No. 6:11-cv-00139 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00139, Dkt. No. 290
Decided
May 17, 2013
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 267 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. All objections are overruled and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness is DENIED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 267) (“Report and Recommendation”), which contains his finding that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,756,129 (“the ‘129 Patent”) are not invalid for indefiniteness, has been presented for consideration.