Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

TracBeam, L.L.C. v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00096 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2013)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103) Non-Infringement Daubert / Expert Challenges
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00096, Dkt. No. 551
Decided
November 25, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
inions of Robert Mills 446 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; AT&T's Motion to Exclude Dr. Rose's Opinions on Claim 25 447 is DENIED; AT&T's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement 448 is GRANTED; Plaintiff TraMEMORANDUM …
Length
18 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions: • Defendants AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility L.L.C.’s (“AT&T”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity1 (Docket No. 444); • AT&T’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non- Infringement (Docket No. 445); • AT&T’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Robert Mills (Docket No. 446); • AT&T’s Motion to Exclude Dr. Rose’s Opinions on Claim 25 (Docket No. 447); • AT&T’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case