Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SFA Systems LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc., et al, No. 6:11-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 401
Decided
April 11, 2013
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth above. Further, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants Amazon, Inc., et al.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness 338
Length
42 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes U.S. Patent No. 6,067,525 (the “‘525 Patent ”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,941,341 (the “‘ 341 Patent”). Also before the Court are Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Indefiniteness (Case No. 6:11cv52, Docket No. 338 and Case No. 6:09cv340, Docket No. 433 ). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions.