Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sipco, LLC v. Abb Inc. et al, No. 6:11-cv-00048 (E.D. Tex. July 30, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00048, Dkt. No. 255
Decided
July 30, 2012
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the claim constructions set forth in this order
Length
79 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed claim terms in the four asserted patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,103,511 (the “‘511 patent) entitled “Wireless Communication Networks For Providing Remote Monitoring Devices ;” and U.S. Patent No s. 6,437,692 (the “‘692 patent”); 7,697,492 (the “‘492 patent”); 6,914,893 (the “‘893 patent”); all entitled “System and Method for Monitoring and Controlling Remote Devices ” (collectively, the “patents -in- suit”). The matter has been fully briefed.