Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

VirnetX Inc. v. Mitel Networks Corporation et al, No. 6:11-cv-00018 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 1, 2012)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:11-cv-00018, Dkt. No. 307
Decided
August 1, 2012
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,502,135 (“the ‘135 Patent”), 7,418,504 (“the ‘504 Patent”), and 7,921,211 (“the ‘211 Patent”). BACKGROUND VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) asserts the three patents-in-suit against Mitel Networks Corporation; Mitel Networks, Inc. (collectively “Mitel”) ; Siemens Enterprise Communications GmBH & Co. KG; Siemens Enterprise Communications, Inc. (collectively “Siemens”) ; and Avaya Inc. (“Avaya”) (collectively “Defendants”).