EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. Skyguard, LLC et al, No. 6:11-cv-00015 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction opinion construes the disputed terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,388,101(“the ‘101 Patent”) and 5,481,546 (“the ‘546 Patent”). For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Eon Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“ Eon”) alleges Defendants1 infringe the ‘101 and ‘546 Patents (“patents-in-suit”). The parties have presented extensive claim construction briefing (Doc. Nos. 187, 201, 206, 207 in the 6:11cv15 case, and 179, 190, 207, 216, 217, 218, and 219 in the 6:11cv317 case).