Promote Innovation LLC v. Motorola, Inc., No. 6:10-cv-00575 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2011)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Daniel Setareh’s (“Setareh”) Motion to Intervene (Doc. No. 28). The matter has been fully briefed (Doc. Nos. 30, 34, 38, 41 & 42). Having considered the parties’ arguments and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court hereby DENIES Setareh’s Motion to Intervene, but finds that Setareh was the first to file as to false marking of U.S. Patents Nos. 4,653,114 (“the ‘114 patent”) and 4,613,901 (“the ‘901 patent”) on various models of Motorola cable modems, including the Motorola SB5100 Surfboard.