Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SFA Systems, LLC v. BigMachines, Inc. et al, No. 6:10-cv-00300 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2011)

Claims Construed
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00300, Dkt. No. 194
Decided
August 8, 2011
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order. The Court DENIES defts' 127 Motion to Strike Undisclosed Evidence
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This case was referred for claim construction only. This opinion construes the terms in United States Patent No. 6,067,525 (the “‘525 patent”). Also before the Court is D efendants’ Motion to S trike Undisclosed Evidence from SFA’ s P.R. 4-5(c) B rief (Docket No. 274), which the Court DENIES. BACKGROUND SFA asserts both method and systems claims from the ‘525 patent. The ‘525 patent is directed to a sale s forc e automation sy stem that integrates intellige nt, automated sale sperson 2 support f or mul tiple p hases of the sa les p rocess.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error