Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sipco, LLC v. Control4 Corporation et al, No. 6:10-cv-00249 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:10-cv-00249, Dkt. No. 133
Decided
February 8, 2011
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 55 Motion to Transfer, and transferring this civil action to the Northern District of Georgia
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.’s (“SII”) Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, To Transfer (Doc. No. 55, “M OTION”). The matter is fully briefed (Doc. Nos. 61 “OPP.;” 66 “REPLY;” 77 “SURREPLY”). Plaintiff SIPCO, LLC (“SIPCO”) also filed a Supplemental Notice In Opposition To Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.’s Motion to Dimiss, Or Alternatively, To Transfer (Doc. No. 114, “S UPP. OPP.”) to which SII filed a response (Doc. No. 116, “S UPP. REPLY”).